Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1172735
Título: Morphophysiological responses of conventional and gm soybean with distinct biotechnological background to weed competition.
Autoria: GALON, L.
FRANCESCHETTI, M. B.
CONCENÇO, G.
MENEGATTI, A. D.
BERNARDI, N. D-C.
BRANDLER, D.
WEIRICH, S. N.
BRUNETTO, L.
SILVA, A. M. L. da
PERIN, G. F.
Afiliação: LEANDRO GALON, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA FRONTEIRA SUL; MILENA BARRETTA FRANCESCHETTI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA FRONTEIRA SUL; GERMANI CONCENCO, CPACT; ANDRÉ DALPONT MENEGATTI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA FRONTEIRA SUL; NATHALIA DALLA CORTE BERNARDI; DAIANI BRANDLER, UNIVERSIDADE TECNOLÓGICA FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; SABRINA NATALIA WEIRICH, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA FRONTEIRA SUL; LEONARDO BRUNETTO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA FRONTEIRA SUL; ANTÔNIO MARCOS LOUREIRO DA SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA FRONTEIRA SUL; GISMAEL FRANCISCO PERIN, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA FRONTEIRA SUL.
Ano de publicação: 2024
Referência: International Journal of Pest Management, 7 May 2024.
Conteúdo: Abstract: New technologies developed to control weeds in crops are flourishing in recent years. Therefore, the objective of this work was to study the competitive ability of soybean cultivars C2531E (Enlist®), M6410 IPRO (RR2®) and BRS 257 (conventional), with distinct biotechnological background, when competing against Euphorbia heterophylla and Urochloa plantaginea. Crops and competitors were studied in distinct plant proportions: 24:0; 18:6; 12:12; 6:18 and 0:24 plants per plot. Fifty days after emergence, plant height, leaf area (AL) and aboveground dry mass (DM), photosynthetic and transpiration rates and stomatal conductance were assessed. Crop responses to competition tended to be species-specific. Soybean M6410 IPRO presents better morphophysiological performance compared to C2531E and BRS 257 when it competed against U. plantaginea. The soybean BRS 257 showed greater LA when competing against U. plantaginea. The competitiveness indices showed that M6410 IPRO responses to competition by accumulating aboveground DM while C2531E responsesby increasing LA. There was difference among cultivars in their strategy to deal with the weed competition, and M6410 IPRO had better competitive ability than the other cultivars when it competed against E. heterophylla.
Thesagro: Soja
Morfologia Vegetal
Biotecnologia
Erva Daninha
Euphorbia Heterophylla
Glycine Max
Palavras-chave: Morfofisiologia vegetal
Interaction between plants
Urochloa plantaginea
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2024.2347861
Tipo do material: Artigo de periódico
Acesso: openAccess
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CPACT)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Morphophysiological-responses-of-conventional-and-gm-soybean-Concenco.pdf4.01 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace