Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1174016
Title: Vaccination versus antimicrobials to prevent Porcine Proliferative Enteropathy: associated costs and effects on piglets’ growth, health, and serological performance.
Authors: GALLINA, M. A.
QUIRINO, M. W.
FRANDOLOSO, R.
TUTIDA, Y. H.
NORENBERG, A.
COLDEBELLA, A.
BIANCHI, I.
KICH, J. D.
Affiliation: MARCO AURÉLIO GALLINA, INSTITUTO FEDERAL CATARINENSE; MONIKE WILLEMIN QUIRINO, INSTITUTO FEDERAL CATARINENSE; RAFAEL FRANDOLOSO, UNIVERSIDADE DE PASSO FUNDO; YUSO HENRIQUE TUTIDA, PAMPLONA ALIMENTOS S/A; ADRIANO NORENBERG, PAMPLONA ALIMENTOS S/A; ARLEI COLDEBELLA, CNPSA; IVAN BIANCHI, INSTITUTO FEDERAL CATARINENSE; JALUSA DEON KICH, CNPSA.
Date Issued: 2025
Citation: Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 12, 2025.
Description: This study evaluated vaccination and prophylactic use of antimicrobials as strategies to prevent Porcine Proliferative Enteropathy (PPE) during nursery and growth-finishing phases. The prophylactic administration of antimicrobials used in this study did not affect the serological performance post-vaccination against L. intracellularis. Additionally, vaccine use to prevent PPE reduced the antimicrobial consumption and related costs by ~70%, with no impairments on production outputs.
NAL Thesaurus: Swine production
Lawsonia intracellularis
Vaccination
Antibiotics
Keywords: Antimicrobial prudent use
Antimicrobial resistance
One health
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1538206
Type of Material: Artigo de periódico
Access: openAccess
Appears in Collections:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPSA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
final10463-vaccination-versus-antimicrobials-to-prevent-porcine.pdf476.94 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace