Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1180399
Título: Mapping priority areas to mitigate the risk of electrocution of range-restricted bird species.
Autoria: BIASOTTO, L. D.
KINDEL, A.
PACÍFICO, E. C.
FILADELFO, T.
PASCHOTTO, F. R.
FAVORETTO, G. R.
SOUSA, A. E. E. A.
SCARIOT, A. O.
ASCENSÃO, F.
Afiliação: LARISSA D. BIASOTTO, BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL
ANDREAS KINDEL, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL
ERICA C. PACÍFICO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO
THIAGO FILADELFO, LEAR’S MACAW RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION GROUP
FERNANDA R. PASCHOTTO, LEAR’S MACAW RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION GROUP
GABRIELA R. FAVORETTO, LEAR’S MACAW RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION GROUP
ANTÔNIO EMANUEL E. A. SOUSA, THE BRAZILIAN NATIONAL CENTER FOR BIRD CONSERVATION AND RESEARCH
ALDICIR OSNI SCARIOT, CENARGEN
FERNANDO ASCENSÃO, CE3C—CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES & CHANGE—GLOBAL CHANGE AND SUSTAINABILITY INSTITUTE.
Ano de publicação: 2025
Referência: Journal of Applied Ecology, v. 62, p. 2787-2799, 2025.
Conteúdo: Power line electrocution is a major threat to bird conservation, particularly for some endangered species. While various mitigation measures have been developed to reduce electrocutions, there is limited information on how to prioritize their implementation for maximum cost-effectiveness. This gap is especially pronounced in remote, understudied areas and for species with restricted ranges, where systematic data is often lacking. Without such prioritization, financial resources risk being poorly allocated, potentially undermining conservation efforts. Cost-effective assessments are, therefore, essential to identify high-risk areas and guide mitigation efforts to where they will have the greatest impact. We propose a framework to identify high-risk electrocution areas for prioritizing mitigation efforts. Our approach integrates the species' potential activity areas with the energy infrastructure hazard surface to produce a risk map, validated against known electrocution records. Additionally, we perform a cost–benefit analysis to determine the number of pylons that would need retrofitting to achieve specific reductions in electrocution events. As a case study, we used Lear's macaw, a range-restricted and endemic species from the Brazilian Caatinga, to illustrate the applicability of our framework. For Lear's macaw, electrocution risk was unevenly distributed across the study area, with the central and southern portions of the energy grid identified as priorities for mitigation. Validation procedures confirmed that the risk map accurately represents electrocution risk. Our cost–benefit analysis revealed that retrofitting 10% of pylons (approximately 37,000) could reduce known electrocution events by 80%.
Palavras-chave: Bird conservation
Electrocution areas
Lear's macaw
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi. org/10.1111/1365-2664.70133
Notas: Na publicação: Aldicir Scariot.
Tipo do material: Artigo de periódico
Acesso: openAccess
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo em periódico indexado (CENARGEN)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Journal-of-Applied-Ecology-2025-Biasotto-Mapping-priority-areas-to-mitigate-the-risk-of-electrocution-of.pdf4.31 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace