Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1188072
Título: High resolution 4D soil organic carbon stock mapping at farm scale.
Autor: ROSIN, N. A.
DEMATTÊ, J. A. M.
RODRÍGUEZ-ALBARRACÍN, H. S.
ROSAS, J. T. F.
BARTSCH, B. dos A.
NOVAIS, J. de J. M.
PELEGRINO, M. H. P.
CERRI, C. E. P.
MELLO, D. C. de
FALCIONI, R.
Afiliación: NICOLAS AUGUSTO ROSIN, CNPS; JOSÉ A. M. DEMATTÊ, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; HEIDY SOLEDAD RODRÍGUEZ-ALBARRACÍN, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; JORGE TADEU FIM ROSAS, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; BRUNO DOS ANJOS BARTSCH, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; JEAN DE JESUS MACEDO NOVAIS, CNPS; MARCELO HENRIQUE PROCÓPIO PELEGRINO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; CARLOS EDUARDO PELLEGRINO CERRI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; DANILO CÉSAR DE MELLO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RENAN FALCIONI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ.
Año: 2026
Referencia: Soil & Tillage Research, v. 264, 107354, Dec. 2026.
Descripción: Soil organic carbon (SOC) is intrinsically linked to global carbon balance, climate change mitigation, soil health, and agricultural productivity. Therefore, obtaining accurate information on the spatial-temporal of the soil organic carbon stock (SOCS) is essential. We proposed a four-dimensional (4D) SOCS mapping approach, encompassing space (two dimensions), depth and time. A 100 × 100 m grid sampling was conducted in 1997 and 2022 at two depths (0–20 cm and 80–100 cm) in a sugarcane farm. Dynamic and static covariates representing the soil formation processes were used to fit three Cubist models. We tested three strategies for SOCS spatial-temporal mapping: 1) a model for each year, 2) a model fitted using only the data of the last year (2022) and 3) a multitemporal model using data of both periods. Based on external validation, strategy 1 and 3 produced more accurate and less biased maps, with coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.74, root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.69 ton ha−1 and bias of 3.43 ton ha−1 and R2 of 0.76, RMSE of 7.19 ton ha−1 and Bias of 3.25 ton ha−1 for strategy 3, respectively. Strategy 2 was less efficient (R2 = 0.71; RMSE = 11.06 ton ha−1; Bias = 7.93 ton ha−1). Strategy 3 is particularly useful for SOCS mapping when only limited temporal observations are available. Soil attributes (static) were most important covariates for modeling, followed by a bare soil image (dynamic) and vegetation information (dynamic). An increase in SOCS was observed in most sampling sites and predicted maps. The SOCS dynamic was related to soil type, geology and showed an inverse relationship with bare soil frequency. Finally, the SOCS saturation deficit was assessed by spatio-temporal mapping.
Palabras clave: Pedometria
Saude do solo
Mapeamento digital do solo
Pedometrics
Soil health
Digital Soil Mapping
Spatio-temporal mapping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2026.107354
Tipo de Material: Artigo de periódico
Acceso: openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPS)

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero TamañoFormato 
High-resolution-4D-soil-organic-carbon-stock-mapping-2026.pdf9,22 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir

FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInGoogle BookmarksMySpace