Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Research center of Embrapa/Collection:||Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste - Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE)|
|Type of Material:||Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE)|
|Authors:||RAMOS, M. O.|
MORORÓ, A. M.
NERES, L. DE S.
LOURENÇO JUNIOR, J. DE B.
|Additional Information:||MARCELA OLIVEIRA RAMOS, UFRA; ALAN MARTINS MORORÓ, UEVA, SOBRAL, CE; LILAINE DE SOUSA NERES, UEVA, SOBRAL, CE; JOSÉ DE BRITO LOURENÇO JUNIOR, UFRA; LEA CHAPAVAL ANDRI, CPPSE.|
|Title:||Avaliação da qualidade do leite de cabra produzido por agricultores dos estados do Rio Grande do Norte e do Ceará.|
|Publisher:||In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE BUIATRIA, 10.; SEMANA DO MÉDICO VETERINÁRIO DO PARÁ, 37.; SIMPÓSIO PARAENSE DE MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA, 5., 2013, Belém. Anais... Belém: Associação Brasileira de Buiatria, 2013.|
|Description:||This study aimed to characterize the quality of goat milk obtained from dairy farms family based in the states of Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará, Brazil, before and after the adoption of good practices in milking, according to Kit Embrapa of Manual Milking for dairy goats. The milk samples for total bacterial counts (CTB) were collected after the morning milking, directly from brass, for three days before and three days after the adoption of Kit Embrapa. The data was statistically analyzed by the statistical program R, through the Student t test for paired samples and comparison of means by logarithmic transformation neperiana. The mean values found were 5,2x105 CFU/mL and 4,1x105 CFU/mL respectively before and after use of the kit. The results indicate that the quality of goat milk produced on estates family based in both States, is within the parameters of hygiene and quality. However, there is a need for improvements in hygiene and sanitary handling of animals before, during and after milking, the milk for obtaining the best commercial quality.|
Leite de Cabra
|Appears in Collections:||Artigo em anais de congresso (CPPSE)|
Files in This Item:
|AvaliacaoQualidadeLeite.pdf||337,32 kB||Adobe PDF|