Title:	Comparação analítica entre resultados da glicemia em bovinos obtidos com glicosímetro portátil vs método enzimático.
Authors:	HELAYEL, M. A. CUNHA, N. C. da MORON, S. E. SILVA, P. C. A. R. da UNHA, I. M. da CHENARD, M. G. CARVALHO, V. de A. N. SOUZA, G. N. de LOPES, S. de P.
Affiliation:	MICHEL ABDALLA HELAYEL, Universidade Federal Fluminense; NATHALIE COSTA DA CUNHA, Universidade Federal Fluminense; SANDRO ESTEVAM MORON, Universidade Federal do Tocantins; PAULO CÉSAR AMARAL RIBEIRO DA SILVA, Universidade Federal Fluminense; ISABELLE MAGALHÃES DA CUNHA, Universidade Federal Fluminense; MARINA GALINDO CHENARD, Universidade Federal Fluminense; VIVIAN DE ASSUNÇÃO NOGUEIRA CARVALHO, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; GUILHERME NUNES DE SOUZA, CNPGL- no artigo consta: Guilherme de Souza Nunes; SAMARA DE PAULA LOPES, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro.
Date Issued:	2020
Citation:	Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, v. 48, 1734, 2020.
Description:	Changes in glycemic levels can negatively affect the body. Several techniques for the measurement of blood glucose have been described, but the enzymatic method is considered standard and more accurate in both humans and animals. The College of American Pathologists recommends the use of portable glucometers (PGs), which are routinely used in human medicine because this is an easy, relatively inexpensive method that delivers results quickly. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the measurement of blood glucose in cattle obtained using portable Accu-Check® glucometer with the enzymatic method (EM), which is still considered standard.
Thesagro:	Metabolismo Bovino
NAL Thesaurus:	Metabolism
Keywords:	Glicemia Glicosímetro Método enzimático Glycemia Livestock animals Glucometer Enzymatic method
DOI:	https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.102954
Type of Material:	Artigo de periódico
Access:	openAccess
Appears in Collections:	Artigo em periódico indexado (CNPGL)