Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/951605| Title: | Comparison between different multiplication methods for stingless bee colonies. |
| Authors: | TEIXEIRA, J. C. da S.![]() ![]() LEÃO, K. S. ![]() ![]() QUEIROZ, A. C. M. ![]() ![]() SANTOS, R. I. R. ![]() ![]() CORDEIRO, H. K. C. ![]() ![]() LAGE-FILHO, N. M. ![]() ![]() VENTURIERI, G. C. ![]() ![]() MENEZES, C. ![]() ![]() |
| Affiliation: | UFRA; UFPA; ANA CAROLINA MARTINS DE QUEIROZ, CPATU; UFRA; UFRA; UFRA; GIORGIO CRISTINO VENTURIERI, CPATU; CRISTIANO MENEZES, CPATU. |
| Date Issued: | 2012 |
| Citation: | In: ENCONTRO SOBRE ABELHAS, 10., 2012, Ribeirão Preto. Anais... Ribeirão Preto: FUNPEC, 2012. |
| Pages: | p. 345. |
| Description: | The demand for stingless bee colonies has increased a lot and the conventional multiplication methods are not enough. The aim of this study was to compare different possibilities for establishing new colonies: (1) Conventional method, using 50% of biological material from the mother-colony; (2) Queenless mini-colony, using about 10% of biological material from the mother-colony; (3) Queenright mini-colony, similar to the previous method, but received a physogastric queen; (4) Confined queenright mini-colony, similar to previous method, but was kept closed for 80 days |
| Keywords: | Production Nest Beehive Queen Demand |
| Type of Material: | Resumo em anais e proceedings |
| Access: | openAccess |
| Appears in Collections: | Resumo em anais de congresso (CPATU)![]() ![]() |








